-1.png)
HB 5468
This bill opens the door to increased state oversight of homeschooling families who are already providing strong educational outcomes. Instead of supporting parental choice, it risks adding layers of bureaucracy that could interfere with how families tailor education to their children’s needs.
HB 5044
This proposal centralizes more authority over vaccine requirements at the state level, limiting flexibility for families and medical decision-making. It moves Connecticut further toward the state making your medical decisions.
SB 450
By redefining the standards, this could impose vaccine standards on all residents in the state of Connecticut whether they agree to it or not.
SB 195
While addressing addiction is critical, this bill normalizes supervised drug use, regardless of age, rather than focusing on recovery and treatment pathways. It raises serious concerns about community impact, public safety, and whether the state is sending the right message.
HB 5537
This is another example of government trying to solve one problem by creating another - higher costs at the register. A new beverage tax will disproportionately impact working families, all while expanding government spending instead of prioritizing within existing resources.
HB 5043
This bill adds new restrictions on firearms without clearly demonstrating how it will improve public safety. Law-abiding gun owners are once again the focus, while underlying issues related to crime and enforcement remain unaddressed.
HB 5436
Expanding definitions and tightening transfer rules creates confusion and legal risk for responsible gun owners. These kinds of changes often penalize compliance while doing little to deter those who already ignore the law.
HB 5533
While election integrity is essential, this bill raises concerns about how broadly these protections could be applied. There is a fine line between safeguarding elections and limiting transparency or public participation in the process.
SB 463
Similar to H.B. 5333, this proposal adds new layers of control over election processes that may reduce oversight rather than strengthen trust. Voters deserve both secure and transparent elections, not policies that could unintentionally undermine confidence.
SB 257
This bill shifts the balance heavily against property owners by limiting when evictions can occur. In the long run, that risks discouraging investment in housing and could reduce availability for the very people who need housing.
SB 438
Regulating self-checkout lanes may sound minor, but given the list of other issues that are facing the state, this isn’t a bill that should be a priority for the majority.
SB 440
Unemployment benefits are meant for those who lose their jobs, not those who voluntarily leave them. This shifts the cost of labor disputes onto taxpayers and could prolong strikes instead of encouraging resolution.
SB 319
Mandating equipment changes at the state and local level imposes new costs on municipalities and small businesses. These one-size-fits-all environmental policies often overlook practical realities and budget constraints, while taking away choice from residents.
SB 452
While well-intentioned, this bill adds another layer of regulation over relatively limited activity. It raises questions about prioritization when there are more pressing environmental and economic challenges facing the state.