Proudly serving Glastonbury


Rep. Srinivasan to Hold Office Hours

Posted on June 19, 2018 by admin


Facebooktwittergoogle_plusmail

GLASTOBURY – State Representative Prasad Srinivasan (R-Glastonbury) will be holding office hours at the Welles Turner Memorial Library on July 18th to meet with constituents and discuss the major issues that came out of the 2018 Legislative Session, including the state budget.

WHEN: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 from 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

WHERE: Welles Turner Memorial Library, 2407 Main Street, Glastonbury

This event is free of charge and open to the public. A sign-in sheet for 15 minute, one-on-one meetings with Rep. Srinivasan will be available upon arrival. If you have any questions, or are unable to attend but would still like to connect with Rep. Srinivasan, please contact him at 1-800-842-1423 or Prasad.Srinivasan@housegop.ct.gov.

In the event that office hours must be postponed or cancelled, a notice will be posted on Rep. Srinivasan’s website at www.RepSrinivasan.com.

Rep. Srinivasan on Improving Management of Life-Threatening Allergies in School System

Posted on May 7, 2018 by admin


Facebooktwittergoogle_plusmail

HARTFORD – As a well-established allergist in Glastonbury, and Ranking Member of the Legislature’s Public Health Committee, State Representative Prasad Srinivasan (R-31) stood today in the House Chamber to offer his support for a bill that would improve school policies on managing life-threatening food allergies.

House Bill 5452 requires the following of all local and regional boards of education:

  • Allow students with life-threatening food allergies to participate in all course curriculum and any culinary program, other than those offered at a technical high school, by implementing allergen restrictions and safety protocols.
  • Include their current plan for managing students with life-threatening food allergies and glycogen storage disease in any school climate or wellness programs that they adopt.

It also requires the State Department of Education to:

  • Revise and update the “Healthy and Balanced Living Curriculum” framework to include life-threatening food allergies and
  • Include dietary restrictions, cross-contaminations, and allergen identification in an any culinary arts program or curriculum standards related to the National Family and Consumer Sciences Standards.
  • Apply for available federal or private funding to promote public awareness and education about food allergies.
  • Revise existing guidelines on managing students with life-threatening food allergies and glycogen storage disease.

Finally, the bill requires all public school district superintendents to annually attest to the State Department of Education (SDE) that their district is implementing this expanded management plan beginning in 2019.

“This is a very important bill that I am happy to have seen pass through the House Chamber,” said Rep. Srinivasan. “I also thank the proponent for reassuring me today that this bill would continue to allow capable students to self-administer epinephrine, or an EpiPen, if necessary. If they are incapable, due to their age or an anaphylactic reaction, an educator or a bus driver will be allowed to administer it and get the student out of immediate danger. Parents can rest assured that their child will receive the care they need to escape any long-term danger that an allergic reaction can cause, in addition, because the training that such educator or bus driver would receive regarding epinephrine administration would also teach them the importance of what comes next; which is calling 911 and monitoring the student while waiting for help to arrive.”

The bill has now been transferred to the Senate, where Rep. Srinivasan hopes it will receive a vote before session ends on midnight on Wednesday, May 9th.

Rep. Srinivasan Urges the Importance of Keeping Electoral College In Presidential Election Process

Posted on May 1, 2018 by admin


Facebooktwittergoogle_plusmail

HARTFORD – As a republic nation, the United States has a very unique system by which we elect a president. It is modeled after our constitution and form of government. Majority party legislators in Connecticut, however, want to change this process. Last week they pushed a bill, H.B. 5421, through the House of Representatives with a vote of 77-73 to adopt an interstate compact to elect a U.S. President solely by a national popular vote. State Representative Prasad Srinivasan (R-Glastonbury) opposed the legislation, saying that it would take away the voices and choices of our citizens.

This bill, which is now awaiting consideration in the Senate, would amend our constitution and enter Connecticut into the “Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote,” thereby committing Connecticut’s votes in the Electoral College to the presidential candidate that wins the popular vote nationally, regardless of whether such presidential candidate wins the popular vote within the state. The compact would take effect when enough jurisdictions have joined and cumulatively possess a majority of Electoral College votes (270).

“This change would go against the very spirit of our great constitution,” said Rep. Srinivasan. “Our transition of power is peaceful and orderly. It is unnecessary to disrupt this process. The Electoral College is in place for a reason – one that particularly benefits the State of Connecticut. As a small state, we rely on our representation in the Electoral College to make elections fair amongst bigger states with a larger input in the National Popular Vote.

“In addition, I am concerned about the constitutionality of this legislation,” said Rep. Srinivasan. “We should be amending our constitution through due process, which is through a constitutional convention held by Congress.”

Rep. Srinivasan Rejects New Judicial Nominations Because of Current Fiscal Crisis

Posted on April 30, 2018 by admin


Facebooktwittergoogle_plusmail

HARTFORD – Nominations to appoint new judges to the Connecticut Superior Court were called today on the House Floor. State Representative Prasad Srinivasan (R-Glastonbury) voted against all the nominations.

“I have had the privilege, as a member of the Judiciary Committee, of hearing from each of these judges directly during public hearings over the past week,” said Rep. Srinivasan. “Each judge has great qualifications for a position in the Superior Court, but given Connecticut’s ongoing budget crisis, this is not the time to appoint new judges. The Office of Fiscal Analysis predicts that the cost of appointing these judges and their support staff will cost our taxpayers $12 million. We are currently in a deficit of $381 million, and running the risking of compromising the funding for services impacting the most vulnerable in our community. We cannot afford to pay the salaries of new judges and their staff and hence I could not support the new nominations.”

All nominations passed through the House of Representatives on party-line votes. The nominations will now be brought up in the Senate.

Rep. Srinivasan Votes for Options, Instead of Mandates

Posted on April 27, 2018 by admin


Facebooktwittergoogle_plusmail

HARTFORD – The Connecticut House of Representatives was alive in debate until 1:00 a.m. on Thursday morning. During this time Legislators voted on two very important pieces of legislation, including House Bill 5210, which mandates expanded insurance coverage for women, children and adolescents.  State Representative Prasad Srinivasan (R-Glastonbury) supported a Republican-proposed amendment to this bill, but ultimately voted against the legislation when the amendment was rejected 57-90.

This bill requires expanded insurance coverage of health benefits that are already required to be covered under the Affordable Care Act, such as women’s health services, including a 12-month contraception supply, and immunizations for children, adolescents, and adults.

“Our amendment to this bill would have ensured that patients are offered a variety of affordable insurance coverage options,” said Rep. Srinivasan, “so they could choose what is best for them, instead of having requirements forced on them. Healthcare is already expensive; I could not support any new mandates on potentially higher-costing health insurance. Patients deserve options so that they can choose what they can afford and how they want to receive care.”

The bill passed through the House with a vote of 114-32. It now awaits a vote in the Senate.