Rep. Camillo Criticizes Senate Democrats for Upholding Malloy Veto

Posted on June 26, 2018 by admin


Vetoed Bill Would Have Protected Educational Aid to Greenwich

HARTFORD – State Representative Fred Camillo (R-Greenwich) praised the House’s decision to override Governor Malloy’s veto of Public Act (PA) 18-35, An Act Prohibiting the Executive Branch from Making Rescissions or Other Reductions to the Education Cost Sharing Grant During the Fiscal Year. The bill was taken up in the Senate, but did not secure the necessary votes to override the veto.

“Today, the Senate Democrats caved to special interests and to Governor Malloy by choosing not to override any of the bills the governor vetoed, especially the education cost sharing bill,” Rep. Camillo said. “Despite initial strong support during the regular session, many Democratic legislators chose politics over policy, and in the process, have left our schools in a tough spot. They also turned their backs on the people of this state who were very supportive of this bill, and many others that were vetoed this year. It is disheartening that we have been forced to go back and resubmit these legislative proposals again next year, but this is part of the legislative process – one we must accept and work even harder to prevent in the future. I thank my House Democratic colleagues who voted with us on the override.”

Following the passage of the compromise budget in October, Governor Malloy used an executive order to cut funding mid-year to several towns across the state, including Greenwich. P.A. 18-35, had the veto been overridden, would have prohibited future governors from making rescissions to a school board’s education cost sharing grant during the fiscal year. Towns have asked for more predictability and sustainability from the legislature, which resulted in this bill.

Despite the bill’s unanimous passage in the Senate and overwhelming support in the House (117-31), the governor vetoed P.A. 18-35 earlier this month. While every Republican in the House and Senate voted in favor of the override, several Democrats in both chambers voted to uphold the veto. In the Senate, where the bill initially passed unanimously on May 9th, ten Democrats changed their position during the veto session. Ultimately, the nays were able to prevent a two-thirds majority, effectively killing the bill.

The House overrode the veto on P.A. 18-35 by a vote of 103-33, while the Senate voted 19-10, sustaining the veto. In order to override a veto by the governor both the Connecticut House of Representatives and Senate must re-pass the bill with a two-thirds majority, which equates to 101 members of the House and 24 members of the Senate.